CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+2 Constraining Dark Matter properties with the first generation of stars.

bump   gds6 +1 kxp265 +1

+2 Testing the Strong Equivalence Principle: Detection of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies.

gds6 +1 cjc5 +1

+2 Measurement of Gravitational Coupling between Millimeter-Sized Masses.

bump   gds6 +2

+1 General solution of the Dirac equation with the Coulomb potential.

bump   oxg34 +1 gds6 +1

+1 M-theory, Black Holes and Cosmology.

kxp265 +1

+1 Probing below the neutrino floor with the first generation of stars.

bump   gds6 +1

+1 Dark Energy: is it `just' Einstein's Cosmological Constant Lambda?.

kxp265 +1

0 The (ultra) light in the dark: A potential vector boson of $8.7\times 10^{-13}$ eV from GW190521.

bump   cxt282 +1

Showing votes from 2020-09-22 11:30 to 2020-09-25 12:30 | Next meeting is Friday Sep 12th, 11:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

  • Topological Gravity as the Early Phase of Our Universe.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Prateek Agrawal, Sergei Gukov, Georges Obied, Cumrun Vafa
     

    Motivated by string dualities we propose topological gravity as the early phase of our universe. The topological nature of this phase naturally leads to the explanation of many of the puzzles of early universe cosmology. A concrete realization of this scenario using Witten's four dimensional topological gravity is considered. This model leads to the power spectrum of CMB fluctuations which is controlled by the conformal anomaly coefficients $a,c$. In particular the strength of the fluctuation is controlled by $1/a$ and its tilt by $c g^2$ where $g$ is the coupling constant of topological gravity. The positivity of $c$, a consequence of unitarity, leads automatically to an IR tilt for the power spectrum. In contrast with standard inflationary models, this scenario predicts $\mathcal{O}(1)$ non-Gaussianities for four- and higher-point correlators and the absence of tensor modes in the CMB fluctuations.

  • Dark Energy: is it `just' Einstein's Cosmological Constant Lambda?.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Ofer Lahav
     

    The Cosmological Constant Lambda, a concept introduced by Einstein in 1917, has been with us ever since in different variants and incarnations, including the broader concept of Dark Energy. Current observations are consistent with a value of Lambda corresponding to about present-epoch 70% of the critical density of the Universe. This is causing the speeding up (acceleration) of the expansion of the Universe over the past 6 billion years, a discovery recognised by the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics. Coupled with the flatness of the Universe and the amount of 30% matter (5% baryonic and 25% Cold Dark Matter), this forms the so-called Lambda-CDM standard model, which has survived many observational tests over about 30 years. However, there are currently indications of inconsistencies (`tensions' ) within Lambda-CDM on different values of the Hubble Constant and the clumpiness factor. Also, time variation of Dark Energy and slight deviations from General Relativity are not ruled out yet. Several grand projects are underway to test Lambda-CDM further and to estimate the cosmological parameters to sub-percent level. If Lambda-CDM will remain the standard model, then the ball is back in the theoreticians' court, to explain the physical meaning of Lambda. Is Lambda an alteration to the geometry of the Universe, or the energy of the vacuum? Or maybe it is something different, that manifests a yet unknown higher-level theory?

  • Modified Gravity and the Black Hole Mass Gap.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Maria C. Straight, Jeremy Sakstein, Eric J. Baxter
     

    We pioneer the black hole mass gap as a powerful new tool for constraining modified gravity theories. These theories predict fifth forces that alter the structure and evolution of population-III stars, exacerbating the pair-instability. This results in the formation of lighter astrophysical black holes and lowers both the upper and lower edges of the mass gap. These effects are explored using detailed numerical simulations to derive quantitative predictions that can be used as theoretical inputs for Bayesian data analysis. We discuss detection strategies in light of current and upcoming data as well as complications that may arise due to environmental screening. To demonstrate the constraining power of the mass gap, we present a novel test of the strong equivalence principle where we apply our results to an analysis of the first ten LIGO/Virgo binary black hole merger events to obtain a $7\%$ bound on the relative difference between the gravitational constant experienced by baryonic matter, and that experienced by black holes, $\Delta G/G$. The recent GW190521 event resulting from two black holes with masses in the canonical mass gap can be explained by modified gravity if the event originated from an unscreened galaxy where the strength of gravity is enhanced by $\sim30\%$ or reduced by $\sim 50\%$ relative to its strength in the solar system.

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.IM

  • No papers in this section today!

gr-qc

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!