The observed tension ($\sim 9\%$ difference) between the local distance
ladder measurement of the Hubble constant, $H_0$, and its value inferred from
the cosmic microwave background (CMB) could hint at new, exotic, cosmological
physics. We test the impact of the assumption about the expansion history of
the universe ($0.01<z<2.3$) on the local distance ladder estimate of $H_0$. In
the fiducial analysis, the Hubble flow Type Ia supernova (SN~Ia) sample is
truncated to $z < 0.15$ and the deceleration parameter ($q_0$) fixed to -0.55.
We create realistic simulations of the calibrator and Pantheon samples and
account for a full systematics covariance between these two sets. We fit
several physically motivated dark energy models and derive combined constraints
from calibrator and Pantheon SNe~Ia and simultaneously infer $H_0$ and dark
energy properties. We find that the assumption on the dark energy model does
not significantly change the local distance ladder value of $H_0$, with a
maximum difference ($\Delta H_0$) between the inferred value for different
models of 0.47 km$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$ Mpc $^{-1}$, i.e. a 0.6$\%$ shift in $H_0$,
significantly smaller than the observed tension. Additional freedom in the dark
energy models does not increase the error in the inferred value of $H_0$.
Including systematics covariance between the calibrators, low redshift SNe, and
high redshift SNe can induce small shifts in the inferred value for $H_0$. The
SN~Ia systematics in this study contribute $\lesssim 0.8 \%$ to the total
uncertainty on $H_0$.