CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+2 Cubic interaction vertices for massive/massless continuous-spin fields and arbitrary spin fields.

jjb239 +1 kjh92 +1

+1 Cosmological Aspects of Higgs Vacuum Metastability.

gds6 +1

+1 Anomalies in Time Delays of Lensed Gravitational Waves and Dark Matter Substructures.

gds6 +1

+1 Measuring the Energy Scale of Inflation with Large Scale Structures.

gds6 +1

+1 Parameter inference and model comparison using theoretical predictions from noisy simulations.

mro28 +1

+1 No evidence for modifications of gravity from galaxy motions on cosmological scales.

sxk1031 +1

+1 Extended $\Lambda$CDM model.

mro28 +1

Showing votes from 2018-09-21 12:30 to 2018-09-25 11:30 | Next meeting is Tuesday Aug 5th, 10:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

  • Parameter inference and model comparison using theoretical predictions from noisy simulations.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Niall Jeffrey, Filipe B. Abdalla
     

    When inferring unknown parameters or comparing different models, data must be compared to underlying theory. Even if a model has no closed-form solution to derive summary statistics, it is often still possible to simulate mock data in order to generate theoretical predictions. For realistic simulations of noisy data, this is identical to drawing realisations of the data from a likelihood distribution. Though the estimated summary statistic from simulated data vectors may be unbiased, the estimator has variance which should be accounted for. We show how to correct the likelihood in the presence of an estimated summary statistic by marginalising over the true summary statistic. For Gaussian likelihoods where the covariance must also be estimated from simulations, we present an alteration to the Sellentin-Heavens corrected likelihood. We show that excluding the proposed correction leads to an incorrect estimate of the Bayesian evidence with JLA data. The correction is highly relevant for cosmological inference that relies on simulated data for theory (e.g. weak lensing peak statistics and simulated power spectra) and can reduce the number of simulations required.

  • No evidence for modifications of gravity from galaxy motions on cosmological scales.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Jian-hua He, Durham), Luigi Guzzo, Baojiu Li, Durham), Carlton M. Baugh, Durham)
     

    The recent discovery of gravitational waves marks the culmination of a sequence of successful tests of the general theory of relativity (GR) since its formulation in 1915. Yet these tests remain confined to the scale of stellar systems or the strong gravity regime. A departure from GR on larger, cosmological scales has been advocated by the proponents of modified gravity theories as an alternative to the Cosmological Constant to account for the observed cosmic expansion history. While indistinguishable in these terms by construction, such models on the other hand yield distinct values for the linear growth rate of density perturbations and, as a consequence, for the associated galaxy peculiar velocity field. Measurements of the resulting anisotropy of galaxy clustering, when spectroscopic redshifts are used to derive distances, have thus been proposed as a powerful probe of the validity of GR on cosmological scales. However, despite significant effort in modelling such redshift space distortions, systematic errors remain comparable to current statistical uncertainties. Here, we present the results of a different forward-modelling approach, which fully exploits the sensitivity of the galaxy velocity field to modifications of GR. We use state-of-the-art, high-resolution N-body simulations of a standard GR and a compelling f(R) model, one of GR's simplest variants, to build simulated catalogues of stellar-mass-selected galaxies through a robust match to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey observations. We find that, well within the uncertainty of this technique, f(R) fails to reproduce the observed redshift-space clustering on scales 1-10 Mpc/h. Instead, the standard LCDM GR model agrees impressively well with the data. This result provides a strong confirmation, on cosmological scales, of the robustness of Einstein's general theory of relativity.

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.IM

  • No papers in this section today!

gr-qc

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • Cubic interaction vertices for massive/massless continuous-spin fields and arbitrary spin fields.- [PDF] - [Article]

    R.R. Metsaev
     

    We use light-cone gauge formalism to study interacting massive and massless continuous-spin fields and finite component arbitrary spin fields propagating in the flat space. Cubic interaction vertices for such fields are considered. We obtain parity invariant cubic vertices for coupling of one continuous-spin field to two arbitrary spin fields and cubic vertices for coupling of two continuous-spin fields to one arbitrary spin field. Parity invariant cubic vertices for self-interacting massive/massless continuous-spin fields are also obtained. We find the complete list of parity invariant cubic vertices for continuous-spin fields and arbitrary spin fields.

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!