Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30
Showing votes from 2018-04-27 12:30 to 2018-05-01 11:30 | Next meeting is Tuesday Aug 12th, 10:30 am.
Macroscopic nuggets of quark matter were proposed several decades ago as a candidate for dark matter. The formation of these objects in the early universe requires the QCD phase transition to be first order - a requirement that is not satisfied in the Standard Model where lattice simulations reveal a continuous crossover instead. In this article we point out that new physics may supercool the electroweak phase transition to below the QCD scale, and the QCD phase transition with six massless quarks becomes first-order. As a result, the quark nuggets composed of six-flavor quark matter (6FQM) may survive as a viable dark matter candidate. The size of a 6FQM nugget is estimated to be around $10^{10}$ grams in mass and $10^{-2}$ cm in radius. The calculated relic abundance of 6FQM nuggets is comparable to the observed dark matter energy density; therefore, this scenario provides a compelling explanation for the coincident energy densities of dark and baryonic matter. We have explored various potential signatures - including a gravitational wave background, gravitational lensing, and transient photon emission from collisions with compact stars and other nuggets - and demonstrated that the favored region of parameter space is still allowed by current constraints while discovery of 6FQM nugget dark matter may require new experimental probes.
A fundamental property of any expanding universe is that any time dependent characteristics of distant objects must appear to scale by the factor $(1+z$). This is called time dilation. Light curves of type Ia supernovae and the duration of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB) are the only observations that can directly measure time dilation over a wide range of redshifts. An analysis of raw observations of type Ia supernovae light curves shows that their widths are proportional to $(1+z)^{(0.088\pm0.036)}$. Analysis of the duration of GRB show that they are proportional to $(1+z)^{(0.25\pm0.16)}$. Both are consistent with no time dilation and inconsistent with a factor of $(1+z$) which implies that the universe is static. In addition it is shown that the standard method for calibrating the type Ia supernovae light curves (SALT2) is flawed, which explains why this lack of time dilation has not been previously observed.