CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+1 Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning.

mro28 +1

+1 Towards Precision Constraints on Gravity with the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure.

jtd55 +1

+1 Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?.

cjc5 +1

+1 First Limit on the Direct Detection of Lightly Ionizing Particles for Electric Charge as Low as $e$/1000 with the \textsc{Majorana Demonstrator}. - [UPDATED]

jxs1325 +1

+1 Post-Newtonian particle physics in curved spacetime.

cxt282 +1

+1 Why do Things Fall?.

lxj154 +1

+1 Probing Planets in Extragalactic Galaxies Using Quasar Microlensing.

jtd55 +1

0 Post-Newtonian effects of Dirac particle in curved spacetime - I : magnetic moment in curved spacetime.

bump   oxg34 +1

0 Post-Newtonian effects of Dirac particle in curved spacetime - II : the electron g-2 in the Earth's gravity.

bump   oxg34 +1

0 Post-Newtonian effects of Dirac particle in curved spacetime - III : the muon g-2 in the Earth's gravity.

bump   jtd55 +1

Showing votes from 2018-02-02 12:30 to 2018-02-06 11:30 | Next meeting is Tuesday Aug 5th, 10:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.IM

  • No papers in this section today!

gr-qc

  • Post-Newtonian particle physics in curved spacetime.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Matt Visser
     

    In three very recent papers, (an initial paper by Morishima and Futamase, and two subsequent papers by Morishima, Futamase, and Shimizu), it has been argued that the observed experimental anomaly in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon might be explained using general relativity. It is my melancholy duty to report that these articles are fundamentally flawed in that they fail to correctly implement the Einstein equivalence principle of general relativity. Insofar as one accepts the underlying logic behind these calculations (and so rejects general relativity) the claimed effect due to the Earth's gravity will be swamped by the effect due to Sun (by a factor of fifteen), and by the effect due to the Galaxy (by a factor of two thousand). In contrast, insofar as one accepts general relativity, then the claimed effect will be suppressed by an extra factor of [(size of laboratory)/(radius of Earth)]^2. Either way, the claimed effect is not compatible with explaining the observed experimental anomaly in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon.

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!