From what is known today about the elementary particles of matter, and the
forces that control their behavior, it may be observed that still a host of
obstacles must be overcome that are standing in the way of further progress of
our understanding. Most researchers conclude that drastically new concepts must
be investigated, new starting points are needed, older structures and theories,
in spite of their successes, will have to be overthrown, and new,
superintelligent questions will have to be asked and investigated. In short,
they say that we shall need new physics. Here, we argue in a different manner.
Today, no prototype, or toy model, of any so-called Theory of Everything
exists, because the demands required of such a theory appear to be conflicting.
The demands that we propose include locality, special and general relativity,
together with a fundamental finiteness not only of the forces and amplitudes,
but also of the set of Nature's dynamical variables. We claim that the two
remaining ingredients that we have today, Quantum Field Theory and General
Relativity, indeed are coming a long way towards satisfying such elementary
requirements. Putting everything together in a Grand Synthesis is like solving
a gigantic puzzle. We argue that we need the correct analytical tools to solve
this puzzle. Finally, it seems to be obvious that this solution will give room
neither for "Divine Intervention", nor for "Free Will", an observation that,
all by itself, can be used as a clue. We claim that this reflects on our
understanding of the deeper logic underlying quantum mechanics.