CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+4 Stacy's response to "La Fin du Mond?..."

bump   jbm120 +1 mro28 +1 gds6 +2

+2 La Fin du MOND? {\Lambda} CDM is Fully Consistent with SPARC Acceleration Law.

bump   mro28 +1 gds6 +1 jbm120 +1

+2 The $\Lambda$CDM simulations of Keller and Wadsley do not account for the MOND mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation.

bump   jbm120 +2

+1 Analyzing the cosmic variance limit of remote dipole measurements of the cosmic microwave background using the large-scale kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect.

jbm120 +1

+1 Marginal evidence for cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae. - [UPDATED]

jtd55 +1 bump   sxk1031 +1

+1 Cameras a Million Miles Apart: Stereoscopic Imaging Potential with the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes.

jbm120 +1

Showing votes from 2016-10-21 12:30 to 2016-10-25 11:30 | Next meeting is Friday May 8th, 11:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • The $\Lambda$CDM simulations of Keller and Wadsley do not account for the MOND mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Mordehai Milgrom
     

    Keller and Wadsley (2016) have smugly suggested, recently, that the end of MOND may be in view. This is based on their claim that their highly-restricted sample of $\Lambda$CDM-simulated galaxies are "consistent" with the observed MOND mass-discrepancy-acceleration relation (MDAR), in particular, with its recent update by McGaugh et al. (2016), based on the SPARC sample. From this they extrapolate to "$\Lambda$CDM is fully consistent" with the MDAR. I explain why these simulated galaxies do not show that $\Lambda$CDM accounts for the MDAR. a. Their sample of simulated galaxies contains only 18 high-mass galaxies, within a narrow range of one order of magnitude in baryonic mass, at the very high end of the observed, SPARC sample, which spans 4.5 orders of magnitude in mass. More importantly, the simulated sample has none of the low-mass, low-acceleration galaxies -- abundant in SPARC -- which encapsulate the crux and the nontrivial aspects of the predicted and observed MDAR. The low-acceleration part of the simulated MDAR is achieved, rather trivially, from the flattish-velocity-curve regions of the simulated high-mass galaxies. b. Half of the simulated galaxies have "wrong" rotation curves that differ greatly from any observed ones. This, does not prevent these wrong galaxies from lying on the observed MDAR (for trivial reasons, again). They, in fact, define the high-acceleration branch of the simulated MDAR. c. To boot, even if $\Lambda$CDM were made "consistent" with the MDAR through the elaborate adjustments that the simulations allow, this would not obviate MOND, which predicts much more than the MDAR.

astro-ph.IM

  • Cameras a Million Miles Apart: Stereoscopic Imaging Potential with the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Joel D. Green, Johannes Burge, John A. Stansberry, Bonnie Meinke
     

    The two most powerful optical/IR telescopes in history -- NASA's Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes -- will be in space at the same time. We have a unique opportunity to leverage the 1.5 million kilometer separation between the two telescopic nodal points to obtain simultaneously captured stereoscopic images of asteroids, comets, moons and planets in our Solar System. Given the recent resurgence in stereo-3D movies and the recent emergence of VR-enabled mobile devices, these stereoscopic images provide a unique opportunity to engage the public with unprecedented views of various Solar System objects. Here, we present the technical requirements for acquiring stereoscopic images of Solar System objects, given the constraints of the telescopic equipment and the orbits of the target objects, and we present a handful of examples.

gr-qc

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!