CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+3 Is there concordance within the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model?.

gds6 +1 mro28 +1 aam80 +1

+2 An ultralight pseudoscalar boson.

aam80 +1 cad96 +1

+2 Geometrical destabilization of heavy scalar fields during inflation.

gds6 +1 aam80 +1

+2 Towards a violation of cosmic censorship.

sxz353 +1 aam80 +1

+1 Quasi-classical Gravity effect on neutrino oscillations in a gravitational field of an heavy astrophysical object. - [UPDATED]

qxc76 +1

+1 What determines large scale clustering: halo mass or environment?.

mro28 +1

+1 A no-go theorem for monodromy inflation.

cad96 +1

+1 Neutrinos secretly converting to lighter particles to please both KATRIN and the cosmos.

gds6 +1

+1 Quantum corrected power spectra of massless minimally coupled scalars during inflation: Effects of Yukawa coupling versus quartic self-interaction.

gds6 +1

+1 Anisotropic expansion of the Universe and generation of quantum interference in light propagation.

gds6 +1

+1 Recovering hidden signals of statistical anisotropy from a masked or partial CMB sky.

mro28 +1

+1 Quark Nugget Dark Matter: Comparison with radio observations of nearby galaxies.

gds6 +1

+1 The DAMIC dark matter experiment.

gds6 +1

+1 Comment on decoherence by time dilation.

qxc76 +1

-1 Inequivalence of Coset Constructions for Spacetime Symmetries: Coupling with Gravity.

cad96 -1

Showing votes from 2015-10-06 11:30 to 2015-10-09 12:30 | Next meeting is Friday Jul 3rd, 11:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

  • What determines large scale clustering: halo mass or environment?.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Arnau Pujol, Kai Hoffmann, Noelia Jiménez, Enrique Gaztañaga
     

    We study the large scale halo bias b as a function of the environment (defined here as the background dark matter density fluctuation, d) and show that environment, and not halo mass m, is the main cause of large scale clustering. More massive haloes have a higher clustering because they live in denser regions, while low mass haloes can be found in a wide range of environments, and hence they have a lower clustering. Using a Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) test, we can predict b(m) from b(d), but we cannot predict b(d) from b(m), which shows that environment is more fundamental for bias than mass. This has implications for the HOD model interpretation of the galaxy clustering, since when a galaxy selection is affected by environment, the standard HOD implementation fails. We show that the effects of environment are very important for colour selected samples in semi-analytic models of galaxy formation. In these cases, bias can be better recovered if we use environmental density instead of mass as the HOD variable. This can be readily applied to observations as the background density of galaxies is shown to be a very good proxy of environment.

  • An ultralight pseudoscalar boson.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Jihn E. Kim, David J. E. Marsh
     

    Using a fundamental discrete symmetry, ${\bf Z}_N$, we construct a two-axion model with the QCD axion solving the strong-$CP$ problem, and an ultralight axion (ULA) with $m_{\rm ULA}\approx 10^{-22}\text{ eV}$ providing the dominant form of dark matter (DM). The ULA is light enough to be detectable in cosmology from its imprints on structure formation, and may resolve the small-scale problems of cold DM. The necessary relative DM abundances occur without fine tuning in constructions with decay constants $f_{\rm ULA}\sim 10^{17}\text{ GeV}$, and $f_{\rm QCD}\sim 10^{11}\text{ GeV}$. An example model achieving this has $N=27$, and a range $11<N<64$ also produces acceptable models. We compute the ULA couplings to the SM, and discuss prospects for direct detection. The QCD axion may be detectable in standard experiments through the $\vec{E}\cdot\vec{B}$ and $G\tilde{G}$ couplings. In the simplest models, however, the ULA has identically zero coupling to both $G\tilde{G}$ of QCD and $\vec{E}\cdot\vec{B}$ of electromagnetism due to vanishing electromagnetic and color anomalies. The ULA couples to fermions with strength $g\propto 1/f_{\rm ULA}$. This coupling causes spin precession of nucleons and electrons with respect to the DM wind with period $t\sim$months. Current limits do not exclude the predicted coupling strength, and our model is within reach of the CASPEr-Wind experiment, using nuclear magnetic resonance.

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.IM

  • No papers in this section today!

gr-qc

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!